Cloning–Problem or Solution?

[Free Courses Article/News]:   The biological world has gone cloning crazy. World newspapers carried the report of the successful cloning of sheep, and articles are now coming out on an almost weekly basis of some other animal that has been cloned. Almost every science or popular magazine that has seen a story on this subject has addressed the question of human cloning. Is all of this a problem for those who believe that God created and made all things? Has the process of cloning somehow eliminated God or minimized or trivialized His creative acts?

What happens in cloning in very simple terms is that reproduction occurs by a man-made process. Genetic material is reproduced in a mechanical physical way instead of by the combination of two different genetic materials. The result is that the properties of the cloned individual are identical to the donor of the original genetic material. If you took a cell from me and cloned it, you would have a person who would have my physical properties. He would not have my memory or even my personality, but he would have my eye color, hair color, sex, height, skin color, etc. If you took five cells from my body and cloned them, you could produce five individuals physically like me.

Horrendous as that may sound, there are some good reasons to do that. Superior strains of animals could be cloned, improving size, resistance to disease, leanness, and other desirable characteristics. Many times a super cow or plant that contains special nutrients is sterile, and if we could reproduce them by cloning, we could ease world hunger. In humans, you could help sterile couples have a child uniquely theirs genetically, or you could make sure a genetically-caused disease is not perpetuated in a family.

From a biblical perspective, is there a problem with this kind of activity. God designed a system that has operated well for a long time. His command was to have each animal “bring forth after their kind.” Certainly that is happening in cloning. God designed the eye with a lens so that we could see, and man has learned in cataract surgery to take the lens out and replace it with a man-made lens. We have learned to make artificial skin, heart/lung machines for open-heart surgery, artificial blood, food supplements, etc. Very few seem to object to these types of procedures. Why would a cloned human be a problem?

The most immediate answer to that question is that the human would not be a spiritual being if it were cloned. The question has to be, “Why not?” The Bible does not tell us specifically when or how the soul of man is fused into his makeup. It seems to this writer that the soul in natural reproduction is present when the sperm meets the egg. In natural reproduction, everything genetic about the person is set when the sperm meets the egg–the person’s eye color, hair color, height, even the weaknesses genetically determined in their body is set. In cloning, it would seem that the same thing would be true. When the genetic material begins its reproductive process, the spiritual dimension is present for that individual. The pattern God gave in the genetic part of the individual is set and being followed. God’s sovereignty is not invaded nor is His plan destroyed.

There are good reasons for not cloning people. The ecological problems of overpopulation would be negatively impacted by adding another method of reproduction. The mental and psychological problems of having a small version of you on earth could be enormous. Geneticists know that combining genetic characteristics can lead to desirable new properties in all living things. The fact still remains that no cloning process or result poses a religious dilemma.

We would suggest that the whole cloning situation has led to another interesting observation. Biologists speak even today about how hard it is to clone anything. When the one successful sheep cloning was accomplished, there were literally hundreds of failures. The complexities of genetic and cell structure are enormous. All of the hardware, failure, hard work, and confusion about how all of this works should be a strong argument that life is not a product of chance. The more complex something is, the less likely it is that it could have come into existence by chance. Truly, we can know there is a God through the things He has made (Romans 1:18-22).

–John N. Clayton, [Free Courses offers this info With Permission from DoesGodExist.Org]

Brethren Assembly | Free Bible College | Biblical Archeology

Free Courses | Free Apologetics Courses | Free Seminary Degrees

 

 

NEANDERTHALS DNA

[Free Courses News]:  DNA from a Neanderthal arm bone considered to be less than 100,000 years old by those analyzing the DNA has turned out to be different in more ways than anyone would have guessed. If you were to analyze the DNA from different races of mankind on the earth today you would find that no race varies by more than eight variations in genetic material from any other race. The Neanderthal DNA, on the other hand, varies from modern human DNA in 27 places. The Neanderthal DNA was extracted from the mitochondrion and should not be easily changed by environmental factors or the extraction process. This does not mean that Neanderthals were a different species, but it does mean that they were significantly different than the racial variations you see in the human population today. Humans who are older than the Neanderthals like Homo Erectus and Rhodesian Man may have been much more varied in physical characteristics than you might be led to believe by most reconstructions seen in textbooks and popular charts like the Time-Life series. Having a broader racial variation among humans than was previously thought possible may seriously challenge the usual evolution of man portrayals of National Geographic, Time-Life, and other popularizers of man’s evolution.–U.S. News and World Report, July 21, 1997, page 9, and Science News, July 19, 1997, page 37 [Free Courses offers this info With Permission from DoesGodExist.Org]

 

Free Courses | Free Apologetics Courses | Free Seminary Degrees

Free Bible College | Biblical Archeology

 

Evolution/Creation Free Course

The conflict between creation and evolution has escalated to a very high level in the last two decades. Almost every person has heard something on this topic without actively trying to do so. It is no longer surprising to see an article on evolution/creation in publications which have no relation to these topics.

Many Christians who never gave any attention to these subjects now find themselves in a very perplexing situation. They believe in creation but, when questioned by an enquirer or a skeptic, they don’t know what to say. Some of them even go to the extant of believing that creation is a spiritual belief while evolution is science. In the light of Logic  this is a false classification.

Read the rest of this entry »

CAVE MEN OR CAVE APES?

[Free Courses News]:   CAVE MEN OR CAVE APES? It is our contention that those who try to construct a scenario of lemur to man frequently ignore race in making their arguments. Was Homo erectus a different species than modern man or was he a different race? Was Neanderthal man an ape or a true man. New discoveries of Homo erectus skeletons have been made in Java in rocks considered to be 27,000 years old, much too recent for most evolutionary scenarios. A flute used by the Neanderthals at about the same time in Ljubljana (in Slovenia) indicates a talent for language and articulate speech, which many anthropologists try to maintain they did not have. We would suggest that wide varieties of ancient man spread over the whole world and that, as more and more data is gathered, we will see that there has been racial variation, but not an inferior cave ape evolving into various species of man, one of which led to us. The oneness of man is seen in many ways, and the fossil record is just one of them. [Free Courses offers this info With Permission from DoesGodExist.Org]

Free Bible College | Biblical Archeology

Free Courses | Free Apologetics Courses | Free Seminary Degrees